[PATCH] Fixes to sha1-el.el

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In [emacs-mime-en : No.00132]
>>>>>	Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com> wrote:

[...]

> Now, the only differences between Gnus and FLIM is the hmac-md5.el
> patch I sent earlier.  Maybe the Gnus patch isn't the best solution
> for it, your comments are appreciated.  (Well, mailcap.el also differ,
> but it is marked obsolete in FLIM.)

> In SEMI, PGG differs considerably.  The Gnus version does not use LUNA
> nor calist.  I'm not sure how this can be merged, unless you want to
> abandon use of LUNA/calist.  What do you think?

I personally don't like those modules.  It is because to debug
modules using especially LUNA is hard to me, even though LUNA
is systematized and perfect program.  Probably, it will be
applied to many ELips programmers.  So, I welcome making it not
use them, personally.  I wrote this, in order to urge many
counterarguments. :)

> Also in SEMI, smime.el is actually a completely different
> implementation than smime.el in Gnus.  Had I been aware of the SEMI
> version, I probably wouldn't have written the Gnus smime.el.  Here, I
> think the best way is actually to abandon both versions, and use
> 'gpgsm' for S/MIME support, instead of OpenSSL.

I admire your eager research.  Unfortunately, I'm not acquainted
with PGG and S/MIME.  I wish the original author of PGG were
here.  Anyhow, I thought it desirable to interchange between
FLIM/SEMI and Gnus communities ever since we were developing
Semi-gnus.

By the way, I am still maintaining T-gnus (based on No Gnus)
which is a successor to Semi-gnus.  Since it is easy to use
switching Gnus and T-gnus, you can develop gpgsm using them. :)

;; Sorry for my late response.  Although I am enjoying to write
;; in English, it takes time. :)
-- 
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka at jpl.org>