[PATCH] Fixes to sha1-el.el
Simon Josefsson
jas at extundo.com
Wed Jan 7 09:03:28 JST 2004
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka at jpl.org> writes:
>>>>>> In [emacs-mime-en : No.00132]
>>>>>> Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Now, the only differences between Gnus and FLIM is the hmac-md5.el
>> patch I sent earlier. Maybe the Gnus patch isn't the best solution
>> for it, your comments are appreciated. (Well, mailcap.el also differ,
>> but it is marked obsolete in FLIM.)
>
>> In SEMI, PGG differs considerably. The Gnus version does not use LUNA
>> nor calist. I'm not sure how this can be merged, unless you want to
>> abandon use of LUNA/calist. What do you think?
>
> I personally don't like those modules. It is because to debug
> modules using especially LUNA is hard to me, even though LUNA
> is systematized and perfect program. Probably, it will be
> applied to many ELips programmers. So, I welcome making it not
> use them, personally. I wrote this, in order to urge many
> counterarguments. :)
I have no counterarguments.
FWIW, the PGG author wrote the patch that removed the calist
dependency. Perhaps that can be seen as endorsement of removing
LUNA/calist, I'm not sure.
> Anyhow, I thought it desirable to interchange between FLIM/SEMI and
> Gnus communities ever since we were developing Semi-gnus.
Definitely.
> ;; Sorry for my late response. Although I am enjoying to write
> ;; in English, it takes time. :)
There's no hurry.
More information about the Emacs-mime-en
mailing list