[PATCH] Fixes to sha1-el.el

Simon Josefsson jas at extundo.com
Wed Jan 7 07:38:02 JST 2004


Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka at jpl.org> writes:

>>>>>> In [emacs-mime-en : No.00129]
>>>>>>	Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com> wrote:
>
>> Here are some fixes made in Gnus CVS to sha1-el.el.  What do you
>> think?  I'm not sure if you also dislike OpenSSL, but perhaps
>> 'sha1sum' is more portable, and thus might be installed in more
>> places.  Any suggestions appreciated.
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks.  Changes made in Gnus are realistic and constructive.
> We need to take it in at any rate.  Although there may be any
> problem, we are using CVS in order to solve it.  I've synch'd
> sha1-el.el in the flim-1_14 branch to Gnus.

Thanks!

Now, the only differences between Gnus and FLIM is the hmac-md5.el
patch I sent earlier.  Maybe the Gnus patch isn't the best solution
for it, your comments are appreciated.  (Well, mailcap.el also differ,
but it is marked obsolete in FLIM.)

In SEMI, PGG differs considerably.  The Gnus version does not use LUNA
nor calist.  I'm not sure how this can be merged, unless you want to
abandon use of LUNA/calist.  What do you think?

Also in SEMI, smime.el is actually a completely different
implementation than smime.el in Gnus.  Had I been aware of the SEMI
version, I probably wouldn't have written the Gnus smime.el.  Here, I
think the best way is actually to abandon both versions, and use
'gpgsm' for S/MIME support, instead of OpenSSL.





More information about the Emacs-mime-en mailing list